比例這個(gè)東西，是根據(jù)擺放和把玩時(shí)候的方便來決定的。一般我覺得長度和寬度以30厘米左右為上限，再大了拿在手上就像揮大刀，而且過大的金屬模型也過于沉重，一不小心失了手，可就香消玉殞了。而過小也不合  適，模型太小，細(xì)節(jié)完全不能做出，這樣就是兒童玩具，不是模型了。

The proportion is determined by the convenience of placing and playing. Generally, I think the maximum length and width is about 30 cm. No matter how big it is, holding it in my hand is like waving a dagger. Moreover, the oversized metal model is too heavy. If I miss it, it will die. And too small is not appropriate, the model is too small, the details can not be made, so it is a children's toy, not a model.

而現(xiàn)在的主力戰(zhàn)機(jī)模型，以1:72為一個(gè)合適的比例，這樣F-XX系列和Su-27兄弟都能在30厘米左右。目前1:72主流飛機(jī)模型里面。

Now the main fighter model, with a ratio of 1:72, can be about 30 cm for both the F-XX series and the Su-27 brothers. Currently, 1:72 is in the mainstream aircraft model.

1:48：直升機(jī)模型一般以1:48為宜（現(xiàn)在市面上的美軍直升機(jī)模型、共軍直升機(jī)模型：武直9、武直10都是這個(gè)比例，俄軍例外，成品里面只能買到塑料的1:72的米-24/28和卡-52）也有少數(shù)固定翼戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)采用這個(gè)比例，這樣產(chǎn)品細(xì)節(jié)容易做，但是顯得太夯，缺點(diǎn)也容易被放大。

1: 48: the helicopter model is generally 1:48 (currently, the U.S. helicopter model and the Communist helicopter model on the market are all at this ratio, except for the Russian army, which can only buy the plastic 1:72 m-24 / 28 and Ka-52 in the finished products). This ratio is also adopted by a few fixed wing fighters, which makes the details of the product easy to do, but it is too tamping, and the shortcomings are easy to be ignored Big.

1:72：主流戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)模型比例，書桌擺臺(tái)剛好合適。

1: 72: the proportion of mainstream fighter model is just right.

1:144：主要做轟炸機(jī)模型、運(yùn)輸機(jī)模型、預(yù)警機(jī)模型等（比如Corgi的B-52、E-3）這個(gè)我認(rèn)為是收集大型飛機(jī)的佳比例。可以保留一點(diǎn)細(xì)節(jié)，又不至于過大或者過小。

1: 144: we mainly do bomber model, transport model, early warning model, etc. (such as Corgi's B-52, E-3). I think this is the best proportion to collect large aircraft. You can keep a little detail, but not too big or too small.

1:200：這個(gè)比例傳統(tǒng)上是客機(jī)模型。但是近有些廠家，把市面上賣得好的主流戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)從1:72縮小到這個(gè)比例，同樣涂裝，我沒買過，但是好像出貨越來越?jīng)坝俊?/p>

1: 200: this scale is traditionally a model airliner. But recently, some manufacturers have reduced the proportion of mainstream fighters that sell well in the market from 1:72 to this ratio. I haven't bought the same coating, but it seems that the shipment is more and more turbulent.

再小的比例，就缺失太多細(xì)節(jié)，沒意思了。盡管不同廠家，如果同樣比例的軍事模型，在一起一點(diǎn)也不突兀。這有點(diǎn)工業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的意思。

No matter how small the proportion is, there are too many details missing. It's boring. Although different manufacturers, if the same proportion of military models, together is not abrupt. It's a bit of industrial standardization.